‹ BackNewsToken valuation

Token valuation

Ignas says fewer than 20 quality tokens have strong revenue backing, calls for more TGEs
Crypto Protocols Are Making Money, but Many Tokens Still Fall as 2026 Revenue Rankings Expose Valuation Gaps
GSR says lower launch valuations and broader token distribution may break the post-listing slide
Kamino’s New York push puts KMNO’s RWA case under focus
Market Analys
2026-09-14 07:03:28

From Public Value to Token Value: Why Crypto Still Lacks the Bridge, the Metrics and the Ledger

A TechFlowPost opinion essay argues that crypto’s biggest capital problem in 2026 is not a lack of money, but a lack of shared measurement tools, reporting standards and value-capture mechanisms for public goods. The piece contrasts booming segments such as real-world assets, stablecoins, ETFs, meme tokens and prediction markets with a quieter deterioration in the funding base for open-source tools, security research, DeSci projects and other infrastructure that the industry depends on. It points to the Ethereum Foundation’s retrenchment, Gitcoin’s token collapse, Helium Mobile’s acquisition, VitaDAO’s mismatch between research cycles and token liquidity, and Friend.tech’s collapse as signs that social value is often created without finding a durable path into protocol or token value. The article reviews existing frameworks from traditional finance and impact investing, including ESG, ESGN, GRI, IRIS+, SROI and Digital Public Goods standards, and argues that crypto has failed to build a comparable disclosure and pricing language for projects whose revenue can be zero but whose ecosystem value remains substantial. It then proposes a six-layer framework that runs from economic value and public value to attribution, protocol capture, token capture and market calibration, while warning about impact washing, subjective shadow pricing, governance capture, fake transparency and lagging market recognition.

1090
From Public Value to Token Value: Why Crypto Still Lacks the Bridge, the Metrics and the Ledger
Policy Regula
2026-09-12 10:40:00

Bankless maps a new token playbook, from VVV to HYPE, as revenue and buybacks take center stage

A Bankless podcast featuring Relayer Capital founder and managing partner Austin Barack argues that crypto investors may need a different framework for the next repricing cycle. Instead of asking which infrastructure narrative comes next, Barack focused on whether applications have real demand, whether revenue can keep compounding, and whether that value reliably flows back to token holders through buybacks or burns. The discussion centered on Venice, Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and ether.fi. Venice was presented as an example of an AI application pairing subscription growth with token burn mechanics, though Barack said his $43.9 price model for VVV depends on optimistic assumptions, including the rollout of Minds and a higher burn rate. Pump.fun, in his view, may be discounted because the market doubts the durability of meme-coin trading demand, even after more than two years of resilient revenue. Hyperliquid, by contrast, commands a richer multiple because its trading business and buyback engine can expand alongside renewed market activity. Barack also argued that ether.fi may be mispriced because investors still view it mainly as a restaking protocol, even though more than 65% of its business now comes from Neo Bank products such as card payments and lending. Still, the show stressed that token buyback multiples are not the same as equity P/E ratios, since token holders often lack a clear legal claim on residual profits or assets.

930
Bankless maps a new token playbook, from VVV to HYPE, as revenue and buybacks take center stage
Analyst sees PUMP at $0.0108-$0.0205 as Pump.fun revenue outpaces valuation
Analyst says PUMP may be undervalued in the short term, but its long-term value capture remains unclear